EOS

EOS is far and away the largest blockchain — in terms of usage, market cap, liquidity, and others — and requires the most active and engaged governance and technical infrastructure.

None of them [blockchains] are fast enough for industrial strength. We have one that just started called EOS, and that will be one of the first fast blockchains. One of the reasons why I think EOS has a shot is because it has a $5 billion-$6 billion war chest.

Even assuming AWS and EOS are interchangeable . . . why do I want a "decentralized AWS" run by a cartel? What would I prefer to build there vs. AWS (or Google Cloud Platform or something else)? I've not only heard of AWS—I've actually used these services. They're great.

EOS is a necessary experiment with decent performance, semi-centralization and invisible fees.

In EOS, a few complete strangers can freeze what users thought was their money. Under the EOS protocol, you must trust a "constitutional" organization comprised of people you will likely never get to know. The EOS "constitution" is socially unscalable and a security hole.