TUSD

TrueUSD

Currency
Price Low: High:
Market Cap
Market Volume
#Building chart...
TrueUSD claim to be a stablecoin that you can redeem 1-for-1 for US dollars.
Comments (4) Add to favorites
Circulating Supply
Max Supply N/A
Github
TrueUSD website
Explorer
Explorer B

Technical Analysis

Historical Prices
Date
Price
Volume
Market Cap
#Buidling history data...
{{ e.date }}
{{ coin.name }} Exchanges
Exchange
Volume
Share
#Buidling exchanges data...
{{ e.name }}
No More Exchanges
External Review
i.e CIO at Kraken
Sentiment
Comments

4 user opinions

SN
Investor at DTC Source
Consider the profile of most stablecoins today: USDC, TUSD and GUSD. They are largely dollar-backed coins by centralized companies. They are not private nor censorship resistant.
Was this helpful? 0 0
| |
Report this comment | (0)
NT
Founder at 1confirmation Source
My view is that the centralized collateral approaches (TrueUSD and Digix being the two most well-known) are not socially scalable enough to be liquid on a global scale in the long run, but they could serve certain customer bases and also be good collateral for more decentralized approaches.
Was this helpful? 0 0
| |
Report this comment | (0)
AP
Co-founder and CIO of BlockTower Capital Source
The only advantage that Tether, XRP, or TrueUSD offer is regulatory arbitrage, which is temporary in nature. Eventually all the rules that make it annoying for banks to use USD for settling cross-border payments will apply to XRP and Tether (and TrueUSD) as well.
Was this helpful? 0 0
| |
Report this comment | (0)
LB
Head of Project Zero at TokenSoft Source
Also, I agree that stablecoins represent a simpler product to audit. However, these organizations (i.e. exchanges) are very complex. TUSD (i.e. Trust Co and Dev/Issuer Co separate) is likely a safer approach than (exchange co and Dev/Issuer Co being combined).
Was this helpful? 0 0
| |
Report this comment | (0)

Most helpful opinions

LB

LB Lawson Baker Head of Project Zero at TokenSoft
Also, I agree that stablecoins represent a simpler product to audit. However, these organizations (i.e. exchanges) are very complex. TUSD (i.e. Trust Co and Dev/Issuer Co separate) is likely a safer approach than (exchange co and Dev/Issuer Co being combined).
Price since: +{{ this.getDifference(1.01) }}%
September 10, 2018
|
AP

AP Ari Paul Co-founder and CIO of BlockTower Capital
The only advantage that Tether, XRP, or TrueUSD offer is regulatory arbitrage, which is temporary in nature. Eventually all the rules that make it annoying for banks to use USD for settling cross-border payments will apply to XRP and Tether (and TrueUSD) as well.
February 10, 2018
|
NT

NT Nick Tomaino Founder at 1confirmation
My view is that the centralized collateral approaches (TrueUSD and Digix being the two most well-known) are not socially scalable enough to be liquid on a global scale in the long run, but they could serve certain customer bases and also be good collateral for more decentralized approaches.
Price since: +{{ this.getDifference(1) }}%
May 23, 2018
|
SN

SN Spencer Noon Investor at DTC
Consider the profile of most stablecoins today: USDC, TUSD and GUSD. They are largely dollar-backed coins by centralized companies. They are not private nor censorship resistant.
Price since: +{{ this.getDifference(1.02) }}%
December 22, 2018
|